From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hummel

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 2010
204 N.J. 32 (N.J. 2010)

Opinion

November 4, 2010.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-117, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL of FAIRVIEW, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed), RPC 3.3(a) (lack of candor to a tribunal), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Hummel

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 2010
204 N.J. 32 (N.J. 2010)
Case details for

In re Hummel

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 4, 2010

Citations

204 N.J. 32 (N.J. 2010)
6 A.3d 436

Citing Cases

In re Myerowitz

5. N.Y. RPC 8.4(h) no N.J. RPC equivalent.The OAE asserts that, where lack of candor to a tribunal is the…

In re Gross

monition for attorney who failed to reveal her client's real name to a municipal court judge when her client…