From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hous. Specialty Ins. Co.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 12, 2017
NO. 14-17-00928-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 14-17-00928-CV

12-12-2017

IN RE HOUSTON SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
234th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2017-48607

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 28, 2017, relator Houston Specialty Insurance Co. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Wesley Ward, presiding judge of the 234th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his November 13, 2017 order denying relator's First Amended Motion to Dismiss under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a.

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator generally must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. We therefore deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Jewell.


Summaries of

In re Hous. Specialty Ins. Co.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 12, 2017
NO. 14-17-00928-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2017)
Case details for

In re Hous. Specialty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE HOUSTON SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 12, 2017

Citations

NO. 14-17-00928-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2017)

Citing Cases

In re Houston Specialty Ins. Co.

The Harris County district court denied HSIC's Rule 91a motion, and the court of appeals denied HSIC's…