From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Henderson

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 28, 2016
136 A.3d 701 (D.C. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16–BS–317.

04-28-2016

In re Reid D. HENDERSON, Respondent.


ORDER

On consideration of the affidavit of Reid D. Henderson, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 28 day of April 2016,

ORDERED that the said Reid D. Henderson is hereby disbarred by consent, effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent's disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.


Summaries of

In re Henderson

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 28, 2016
136 A.3d 701 (D.C. 2016)
Case details for

In re Henderson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: REID D. HENDERSON, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 497514

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Apr 28, 2016

Citations

136 A.3d 701 (D.C. 2016)

Citing Cases

Yellow Motor Co. v. Davis

We do not stop to examine whether the writ of prohibition is a proper remedy under the circumstances here…

Shell Co. of California v. Dunn

In the English courts and in many of the courts of the United States the rule has been held applicable only…