From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hein

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 19, 1999
704 N.E.2d 576 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-2388.

January 19, 1999.


REVISED INTERIM ORDER

Due to a clerical error at the Supreme Court that caused complainant's counsel to receive untimely notice of the five-judge commission's order dated December 18, 1998, the commission hereby orders that the complainant's attorney file his requested attorney fees and accompanying affidavit in accordance with DR 2106 no later than January 21, 1999. The attorney fees are to be itemized by date, time, and service performed with the hourly rate charged, and the affidavit of the complainant's attorney shall address each of the items stated in DR 2-106 (B). On or before January 28, 1999, the respondent may file a response to the complainant's affidavit The complainant's affidavit and the respondent's reply shall be filed in the manner set forth in the Supreme Court's order of November 16, 1998 with a copy served on opposing counsel or the opposing party if not represented by counsel.

The five-judge commission will determine the reasonableness and necessity of the attorney's fees and deposition costs requested by complainant based on the pleadings before the commission at that time. Thereafter, the final order of the five-judge commission shall issue pursuant to Rule II, Section 5(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION.

Richard A. Dove Secretary of the Commission Date: January 19, 1999

MERIT DOCKET


Summaries of

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hein

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 19, 1999
704 N.E.2d 576 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hein

Case Details

Full title:In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Jonathan P. Hein

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 19, 1999

Citations

704 N.E.2d 576 (Ohio 1999)
704 N.E.2d 576