From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Haylee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 20, 2008
56 A.D.3d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503324.

November 20, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Connerton, J.), entered August 16, 2007, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10-A, to approve petitioner's permanency plan for respondent's child.

Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for appellant.

Kuredin V. Eytina, Broome County Department of Social Services, Binghamton, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Kavanagh, JJ.


Respondent appeals from Family Court's August 2007 order which approved petitioner's permanency plan with a goal to free respondent's daughter for adoption. Based on the court's March 2008 order approving a subsequent permanency plan, this appeal is moot ( see Matter of Shontae R., 48 AD3d 1006, 1006; see also Matter of Kila DD., 34 AD3d 1168, 1169; Matter of Jolyssa EE., 28 AD3d 824, 825; Matter of Lisa Z., 276 AD2d 853, 853). As no exception to the mootness doctrine is present, we dismiss the appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Haylee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 20, 2008
56 A.D.3d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Haylee

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAYLEE RR., a Neglected Child. BROOME COUNTY DEPARTMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 20, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9125
867 N.Y.S.2d 352

Citing Cases

In re Rebecca

Furthermore, while the foster parents are not interested in adopting the child at this time, they have stated…

In re Nasira D.

In view of this subsequent order, the issues asserted on appeal regardingthe 2011 permanency hearing order…