From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hartwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

September 27 1996.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Before: Present — Green, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition seeking to invalidate the petition designating Joan W. Scalise as the Democratic candidate for the office of Comptroller of the City of Utica. The court invalidated 358 of the 1, 742 signatures on the designating petition. Petitioner, however, failed to present proof sufficient to warrant invalidation of the 1, 384 remaining valid signatures. "[S]omething more than petitioner's pure speculation is required to invalidate the signatures" ( Matter of Berbary v Moss, 154 AD2d 870, 871). Petitioner was given the opportunity to proffer evidentiary proof to support his objections to the designating petition and failed to do so. We have considered the remaining objections advanced by petitioner and conclude that each one is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Election Law.)

(Filed Aug. 21, 1996.)


Summaries of

In re Hartwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Hartwell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSH S. MARGULIES, Appellant, v. DAVID HARTWELL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 394