From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Harter

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 17, 2013
2 N.E.3d 265 (Ohio 2013)

Opinion

No. 2013–1907.

2013-12-17

In re HARTER.


On Application for Reinstatement.
On Application for Reinstatement.

{¶ 1} On December 9, 2013, this court suspended respondent, Brian Wade Harter, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On December 12, 2013, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child-support order previously submitted to the court.

{¶ 2} On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Brian Wade Harter, Attorney Registration No. 0055500, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, be reinstated to the practice of law.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Harter

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 17, 2013
2 N.E.3d 265 (Ohio 2013)
Case details for

In re Harter

Case Details

Full title:In re HARTER.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

2 N.E.3d 265 (Ohio 2013)
137 Ohio St. 3d 1260

Citing Cases

Disciplinary Counsel v. Harter

We suspended his license to practice law for five days in December 2013 because he had defaulted on a…