From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hancock

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 22, 2009
964 A.2d 1278 (D.C. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-BG-1301.

January 22, 2009.

BEFORE: KRAMER, Associate Judge, BELSON and STEADMAN, Senior Judges.


ORDER


On further consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Supreme Court of the State of New York disbarring respondent, see In re Hancock, 55 A.D.3d 216, 863 N.Y.S.2d 804 (2008), this court's November 10, 2008, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, Bar Counsel's December 18, 2008, Statement Regarding Reciprocal Discipline recommending disbarment as identical reciprocal discipline, and there appearing to be no exceptions or oppositions to the recommendation, and it further appearing that respondent has failed to file the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Frank J. Hancock is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia; however, for purposes of reinstatement, this disbarment will not commence to run until such time as respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g). See In re Weaver, 954 A.2d 425 (D.C. 2008) (Five year suspension with fitness requirement based on reciprocal matter in California when respondent resigned pending a disciplinary investigation after respondent was convicted of conspiracy to commit unauthorized practice of law) and In re Harper, 785 A.2d 311 (D.C. 2001) (disbarment based on reciprocal matter relating to scheme involving unauthorized practice of law in representation of clients of disbarred attorneys).


Summaries of

In re Hancock

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 22, 2009
964 A.2d 1278 (D.C. 2009)
Case details for

In re Hancock

Case Details

Full title:In re Frank J. HANCOCK, Esquire, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 961151

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 2009

Citations

964 A.2d 1278 (D.C. 2009)