From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Griffith

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 9, 1998
700 N.E.2d 617 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

98-1670

October 9, 1998


On September 24, 1998, this court suspended respondent, Curtis Griffith, a.k.a. Curtis Griffith, Jr., for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On October 1, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(C) noticing this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Curtis Griffith, a.k.a. Curtis Griffith, Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0030707, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2) reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS


Summaries of

In re Griffith

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 9, 1998
700 N.E.2d 617 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

In re Griffith

Case Details

Full title:In re Griffith

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 9, 1998

Citations

700 N.E.2d 617 (Ohio 1998)
83 Ohio St. 3d 1454

Citing Cases

Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

As aggravating features, the board first found that respondent had previously been suspended from the…