From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gonzalez

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 19, 2017
230 N.J. 55 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

07-19-2017

In the MATTER OF Nelson GONZALEZ, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 020401997)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16–140, concluding on the record pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f)(default by respondent) that the formal ethics complaint filed against NELSON GONZALEZ of DOVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct;

And NELSON GONZALEZ having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court agreeing with the Disciplinary Review Board that the charged violations of RPC 1.5(b) and RPC 1.2(c) should be dismissed;

And the Court also finding that respondent's failure to file an answer to the complaint does constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b), but the Court concluding that discipline is not warranted for this violation alone under the circumstances presented, where respondent provided representation to the client and obtained the relief sought;

It is ORDERED that the formal ethics complaint filed against NELSON GONZALEZ in District Docket No. XB–2015–0015E, is dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Gonzalez

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 19, 2017
230 N.J. 55 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

In re Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Nelson GONZALEZ, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 19, 2017

Citations

230 N.J. 55 (N.J. 2017)
164 A.3d 1060

Citing Cases

In re Marinelli

He also violated RPC 8.1(b), by failing to file an answer to the formal ethics complaint. In re Gonzalez, 230…

In re Levasseur

The failure to file an answer to an ethics complaint constitutes a violation of RPC 8.1(b). See In re…