From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Goldsmith

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 17, 2010
201 N.J. 160 (N.J. 2010)

Opinion

February 17, 2010.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-230, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that JEFF H. GOLDSMITH of FORT LEE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect) and RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JEFF H. GOLDSMITH is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Goldsmith

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 17, 2010
201 N.J. 160 (N.J. 2010)
Case details for

In re Goldsmith

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JEFF H. GOLDSMITH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 17, 2010

Citations

201 N.J. 160 (N.J. 2010)
989 A.2d 255

Citing Cases

In re Beran

Generally, if only one of the prongs is satisfied, the motion is denied. See, e.g., Supreme Court issued…