From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gleason

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 30, 2015
220 N.J. 350 (N.J. 2015)

Opinion

D-27 September Term 2014, 075179

01-30-2015

In the Matter of Martin A. GLEASON, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 045961992).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision 14–139, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent) that MARTIN A. GLEASON of BOUND BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be admonished for violating of RPC 1.4(b) (failure to adequately communicate with the client) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Gleason

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 30, 2015
220 N.J. 350 (N.J. 2015)
Case details for

In re Gleason

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Martin A. GLEASON, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 30, 2015

Citations

220 N.J. 350 (N.J. 2015)
220 N.J. 350

Citing Cases

In re Wittenberg

Admonitions typically are imposed for failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities, if the attorney…

In re Witherspoon

Admonitions likewise are imposed for failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities, if the attorney…