From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Garcia

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 13, 2004
No. 05-04-00010-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2004)

Opinion

No. 05-04-00010-CV.

Opinion Issued January 13, 2004.

Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and RICHTER.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator requests this Court issue a writ of mandamus ordering the chair of the Dallas County Democratic Party to declare him eligible for placement on the ballot for the Democratic Party primary election for the office of State Representative for District 103 for the March 2004 primary election. The facts of this original proceeding are known to the parties so we do not recite them here.

Relator submitted two original affidavits to this Court for consideration. The record does not contain any proof that these affidavits were presented to respondent below before the making of her decision to declare relator ineligible. The Court may not consider evidence not presented to the decision maker prior to her decision on review with this Court. See Sabine Offshore Service, Inc. v. City of Port Arthur, 595 S.W.2d 840, 841 (Tex. 1979). Therefore, the Court GRANTS respondent's motion to strike the affidavits and disregards them in ruling on this petition. Based on the record presented, we conclude the relator has failed to show himself entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Garcia

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 13, 2004
No. 05-04-00010-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2004)
Case details for

In re Garcia

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DOMINGO GARCIA, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 13, 2004

Citations

No. 05-04-00010-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2004)

Citing Cases

In re Liebbe

See In re E. Tex. Med. Ctr. Athens, 154 S.W.3d 933, 936 n.1 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2005, orig. proceeding); see…

In re Harrison

The motion to strike the letter from relator dated September 12, 2012 is granted because this letter was not…