From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Friedman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 26, 1956
121 A.2d 539 (N.J. 1956)

Opinion

Argued March 26, 1956 —

Decided March 26, 1956.

For the order: Mr. John V. Crowell.

For the respondent: Mr. Isidore Friedman, pro se.


The Monmouth County Ethics and Grievance Committee has filed a presentment charging the respondent, Isidore Friedman, with unprofessional conduct. It appears that the respondent was indicted by the Monmouth County grand jury in eight indictments each charging embezzlement. On February 17, 1956 respondent entered a plea of non vult to three of the indictments and is presently waiting sentence.

A total of 26 charges have been lodged against the respondent with the Prosecutor of Monmouth County involving embezzlement, conversion, obtaining money under false pretenses and uttering worthless checks. The total amount of money involved is $61,818.

The respondent having admitted before this court the commission of crimes involving moral turpitude the order of the court is that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

In re Friedman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 26, 1956
121 A.2d 539 (N.J. 1956)
Case details for

In re Friedman

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ISIDORE FRIEDMAN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 26, 1956

Citations

121 A.2d 539 (N.J. 1956)
121 A.2d 539

Citing Cases

Matter of Friedman

Name of respondent stricken from the roll of attorneys at law. Opinion reported at 21 N.J. 273.…

Gallo Asphalt Co. v. Sagner

Thus, this case is not strictly analogous to other instances in which prior pleas of nolocontendere have been…