From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re French-Am. Aid for File Children, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 29, 2017
151 A.D.3d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-29-2017

In re FRENCH–AMERICAN AID FOR FILE CHILDREN, INC., et al., Petitioners–Respondents, Joerg Klebe, Objectant–Appellant, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Respondent–Respondent.

John A. Barone, Bronx, for appellant. Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP, New York (Gary B. Freidman of counsel), for French–American Aid for Children, Inc., respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Seth M. Rokosky of counsel), for Attorney General, respondent.


John A. Barone, Bronx, for appellant.Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP, New York (Gary B. Freidman of counsel), for French–American Aid for Children, Inc., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Seth M. Rokosky of counsel), for Attorney General, respondent.

Decree, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Rita Mella, S.), entered June 9, 2016, inter alia, adjudging that petitioner's revocation of a trust of which objectant is a trustee was valid, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Objectant's contention that petitioner did not properly revoke the trust because it used Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) § 7–1.9(a) instead of § 8–1.1.(c)(2) is unavailing. Before 1985, cases held that a charitable trust could use the predecessor of EPTL 7–1.9(a) (see e.g. Hanover Bank v. United Brethren's Church on Staten Is., 134 N.Y.S.2d 356, 361–362 [Sup.Ct., N.Y. County 1954] ). In 1985, EPTL 7–1.9 was amended to add subsection c, which provided that "[a] trust ... wholly benefitting one or more charitable beneficiaries may be terminated as provided for by" EPTL 8–1.1(c)(2) (emphasis added). Nothing in either the text of EPTL 7–1.9(c) or the legislative history thereof indicates that charitable trusts were restricted to EPTL 8–1.1(c)(2) after 1985 (see generally Allstate Ins. Co. v. Belt Parkway Imaging, P.C., 78 A.D.3d 592, 914 N.Y.S.2d 5 [1st Dept.2010] ). Moreover, post-amendment cases indicate that charitable trusts may still use EPTL 7–1.9(a) (see e.g. Board of Trustees of Museum of Am. Indian, Heye Found. v. Board of Trustees of Huntington Free Lib. & Reading Room, 197 A.D.2d 64, 85–86, 610 N.Y.S.2d 488 [1st Dept.1994], lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 702, 631 N.Y.S.2d 606, 655 N.E.2d 703 [1995] ; Matter of Forester, NYLJ, Dec. 3, 2001, at 17, col. 3 [Sur.Ct., N.Y. County 2001] ).

SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, KAPNICK, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re French-Am. Aid for File Children, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 29, 2017
151 A.D.3d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re French-Am. Aid for File Children, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re FRENCH–AMERICAN AID FOR FILE CHILDREN, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 29, 2017

Citations

151 A.D.3d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
151 A.D.3d 662

Citing Cases

People v. Sanford

The court credited the detective's testimony that he felt and located the knife but he was unable to safely…

People v. Hernandez

The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the drugs found in defendant's backpack at…