From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Frederick Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1996
232 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 8, 1996.

Determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights dated April 3, 1995, which dismissed petitioner's complaint of sex discrimination against her former employer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered July 25, 1995) dismissed, without costs.

Before: Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


The determination of respondent was supported by substantial evidence in the record. There was no proof of a retaliatory firing presented by petitioner and the employer was experiencing financial difficulties. The petitioner was not replaced by a male, her position was eliminated and her duties were assumed by another female already on staff. We have considered petitioner's other arguments, including that respondent employer's attorney should have been disqualified under the advocate-witness rule, and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

In re Frederick Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1996
232 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Frederick Goldman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PILAR Z. MAURY, Petitioner, v. FREDERICK GOLDMAN, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 8, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 80

Citing Cases

O'Connor v. Bank of New York

Based on his assessment, he recommended that plaintiff's position be eliminated (id.). Thus, it is clear that…