From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fisher

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 28, 1989
101 B.R. 507 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1989)

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 2-85-00644. Adv. No. 2-86-0057.

July 28, 1989.

Susan L. Rhiel, Thompson, Hine and Flory, Columbus, Ohio, for Thomas C. Scott, trustee.

Robert H. Farber, Jr., Columbus, Ohio, for defendant.

Charles M. Caldwell, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Columbus, Ohio, Asst. U.S. trustee.


AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Motion to Amend Judgment to Conform with the Pleadings ("Motion") and the reply thereto filed by Thomas C. Scott, Trustee ("Trustee"). Having reviewed the Motion and reply, as well as the entire Court file, the Court hereby finds that the Opinion and Order entered June 1, 1989, should be amended to reflect that the correct amount of the preferential transfer received by Almiro Fur Fashion Design, Ltd. ("Almiro") was $11,155. 100 B.R. 351.

The Court's Opinion and Order of June 1, 1989, made reference to three particular mink coats which were transferred to Almiro within the preference period. The value of these three mink coats totaled $9,790. However, the admissions made by Almiro in its answers to interrogatories, which were filed with the Court by the Trustee, indicate that two additional transfers also were made during the ninety-day preference period. Specifically, Almiro's answer to the Interrogatory No. 3 reflects that a transfer in the amount of $685 (Invoice # 5471) was made on December 12, 1984, and a transfer in the amount of $680 (Invoice # 5520) was made on December 17, 1984. The sum of the aforestated two figures — $1,365 — when added to the amount received by Almiro as a result of the three transfers referenced in the Court's original Opinion and Order — $9,790 — equals $11,155.

Accordingly, the Court's Opinion and Order is hereby amended to state that Almiro received preferential transfers totaling $11,155. An amended judgment entry granting judgment in favor of the Trustee in this amount shall be entered forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Fisher

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 28, 1989
101 B.R. 507 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1989)
Case details for

In re Fisher

Case Details

Full title:In re Julius Dudley FISHER aka Jud Fisher dba Kingston Lee Furriers…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 28, 1989

Citations

101 B.R. 507 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1989)

Citing Cases

In re Zwagerman

1971); In re Bro Cliff, Inc., 8 U.C.C.Rep.Serv. (Callaghan) 242 (W.D.Mich. 1970); Quaker City Iron Works,…

In re National Lumber Supply, Inc.

Several courts have agreed. The court in In re Fisher, 100 B.R. 351, 355 (S.Ohio 1989), amended 101 B.R. 507…