From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Paul Gallagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 2011
81 A.D.3d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-00949.

February 15, 2011.

In a probate proceeding to judicially settle the final accounts of an estate, the successor administrator, Kevin Gallagher, appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Lopez Torres, S.), dated December 3, 2009, as, after a nonjury trial, denied his objections to and judicially settled the final account of Kathleen Gallagher, the original administrator of the estate, and granted the objections of Wendy Walton to his amended final account.

Sweeney, Gallo, Reich Bolz LLP, Rego Park, N.Y. (Michael H. Reich of counsel), for appellant.

Peter G. Gray, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent Wendy Walton. Mait Wang Simmons, New York, N.Y. (William R. Mait of counsel), for respondent Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.

Before: Covello, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Lott, JJ.


Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the appellant personally.

In an accounting proceeding, the party submitting an account has the ultimate burden of demonstrating that he or she has fully accounted for all of the assets of the estate (see Matter of Tract, 284 AD2d 543; Matter of Schnare, 191 AD2d 859, 860). "While the party submitting objections bears the burden of coming forward with evidence to establish that the account is inaccurate or incomplete, upon satisfaction of that showing the accounting party must prove, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that his or her account is accurate and complete" ( Matter of Tract, 284 AD2d at 543; see Matter of Campione, 58 AD3d 1032, 1034; Matter of Schnare at 860).

On appeal from a decree entered after a nonjury trial, this Court "may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case `the fact that the [Surrogate] had the advantage of seeing the witnesses'" ( Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499, quoting York Mtge. Corp. v Clotar Constr. Corp., 254 NY 128, 134 [1930]; Matter of Verdeschi, 63 AD3d 1084, 1086; We're Assoc. Co. v Rodin Sportswear, 288 AD2d 465; DiBruno v Abrams, 208 AD2d 672, 674).

Upon our review of the record, we find no basis to set aside the determination of the Surrogate that the successor administrator, Kevin Gallagher, failed to come forward with credible evidence to establish that the final account of the original administrator, Kathleen Gallagher, was inaccurate or incomplete.

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In re Estate of Paul Gallagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 2011
81 A.D.3d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Estate of Paul Gallagher

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of PAUL GALLAGHER, Also Known as PAUL J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1274
916 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

In re DiGiovanna

" ‘While the party submitting objections bears the burden of coming forward with evidence to establish that…

Saline v. Hartman (In re DiGiovanna)

When petitioning for judicial settlement of an account, the party submitting the account has the burden of…