From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Keeler

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District
Jun 20, 1985
479 N.E.2d 105 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 3-684 A 164.

June 20, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, LaGrange County, Howard E. Petersen, J.

Kevin L. Likes, Grimm Grimm, P.C., Auburn, for appellant.

J. Scott Vanderbeck, Richard K. Muntz, P.C., LaGrange, for appellee.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING


We grant the petition for rehearing for the sole purpose of clarifying our holding on the issue of the trial court's nunc pro tunc order correcting the docket sheet entry to reflect the correct filing date of the Welfare Department's claim.

The Clerk of the LaGrange Circuit Court has certified that the records of the court contain an original and a duplicate original of the claim. The claim forms are physically attached and one bears an illegible file stamp. The second claim form, what appears to be the duplicate original, bears the faint but legible date of September 14, 1983.

It is thus indisputable that the entry was based on written material contemporaneous with the date of the action described, found in the records of the case, required by law to be kept, showing the action taken. Stowers v. State (1977), 266 Ind. 403, 363 N.E.2d 978.

We, therefore, reaffirm our holding in In Re Estate of Keeler (1985), Ind. App., 476 N.E.2d 917 that the nunc pro tunc entry was proper. In all other matters our earlier opinion is unchanged.

HOFFMAN and GARRARD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Estate of Keeler

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District
Jun 20, 1985
479 N.E.2d 105 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

In re Estate of Keeler

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES W. KEELER, (DECEASED). JUDY MARIE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District

Date published: Jun 20, 1985

Citations

479 N.E.2d 105 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Senasu v. Guardianship of Volk

Scott County School District 1 v. Asher (1975), 263 Ind. 47, 51, 324 N.E.2d 496, 499. He urges us to conclude…

Estate of Helms v. Helms-Hawkins

Nevertheless, we cannot see how Appellants were prejudiced by the caption or cause number of Tyeanne's Motion…