From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Eskin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 26, 1999
158 N.J. 259 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

May 26, 1999.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 31, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that by way of reciprocal discipline, DAVID J. ESKIN of BRONX, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for forgery and false notarization of a notice of claim filed after the expiration of the ninety-day time limitation set forth in the New York statutes, for which conduct respondent was suspended from practice in the State of New York for a period of six months effective May 28, 1998, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID J. ESKIN is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, retroactive to May 28, 1998; and it is further

ORDERED that no application for reinstatement to practice be submitted unless and until respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in New York; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Eskin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 26, 1999
158 N.J. 259 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

In re Eskin

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID J. ESKIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 26, 1999

Citations

158 N.J. 259 (N.J. 1999)
729 A.2d 430

Citing Cases

In re Pomper

Sloane pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and received a two-year suspension; Takacs was suspended for…

In re Percy

nsurance companies, alleging that either they or their clients had sustained personal injury. Sloane pleaded…