From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Eltzroth

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 27, 2009
382 S.C. 275 (S.C. 2009)

Opinion

No. 26643.

Submitted April 3, 2009.

Decided April 27, 2009.

Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and Barbara M. Seymour, Deputy Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

John E. Parker, of Peters Murdaugh Parker Eltzroth Derrick, PA, of Hampton, for respondent.


In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the issuance of an admonition, public reprimand, or definite suspension not to exceed ninety (90) days. See Rule 7(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. We accept the Agreement and definitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state for a ninety (90) day period. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

Respondent self-reported to ODC that he failed to file his state and federal income tax returns from 2000 to 2007. Respondent represents that no criminal charges are pending or anticipated.

LAW

Respondent admits that his misconduct constitutes grounds for discipline pursuant to Rule 7, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, specifically Rule 7(a)(1) (it shall be a ground for discipline for a lawyer to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or any other rules of this jurisdiction regarding professional conduct of lawyers). Further, he admits he has violated Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR (it is professional misconduct for lawyer to commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects).

CONCLUSION

We accept the Agreement for Discipline by Consent and definitely suspend respondent from the practice of law for a ninety (90) day period. Within fifteen days of the date of this opinion, respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

DEFINITE SUSPENSION.

TOAL, C.J., WALLER, PLEICONES, BEATTY and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Eltzroth

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 27, 2009
382 S.C. 275 (S.C. 2009)
Case details for

In re Eltzroth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Clyde A. ELTZROTH, Jr., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 27, 2009

Citations

382 S.C. 275 (S.C. 2009)
676 S.E.2d 689

Citing Cases

State v. Daugherty

PER CURIAM Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 702, SCRE ("If…

State v. Daugherty

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and…