From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Douglass

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2015
592 F. App'x 948 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1207

02-09-2015

IN RE ANDREW IAN DOUGLASS

JOHN THOMAS HARDING, Morrison Mahoney, LLP, Boston, MA argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH B. MILSTEIN, Milstein Zhang & Wu LLC, Newton, MA. JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, NATHAN K. KELLEY.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 09/527,507.

JUDGMENT

JOHN THOMAS HARDING, Morrison Mahoney, LLP, Boston, MA argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH B. MILSTEIN, Milstein Zhang & Wu LLC, Newton, MA. JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, NATHAN K. KELLEY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Douglass

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2015
592 F. App'x 948 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

In re Douglass

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ANDREW IAN DOUGLASS

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2015

Citations

592 F. App'x 948 (Fed. Cir. 2015)