From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disqualification of Fuerst

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 17, 1996
77 Ohio St. 3d 1253 (Ohio 1996)

Summary

In Fuerst, I declined to establish a per se rule of disqualification based on a judge's religious affiliation, absent some affirmative indication of bias, prejudice, or other disqualifying interest.

Summary of this case from Koukios v. Ganson

Opinion

No. 96-AP-155

Decided October 17, 1996.

ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas case No. 269722.


Affiant is the plaintiff in a civil action pending before Judge Norman A. Fuerst. The underlying action involves affiant's allegations of sexual abuse by Father Edward F. Rupp, a Catholic priest, and the defendants include the priest and the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland. Affiant seeks the disqualification of Judge Fuerst and all other judges of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas who are members of the Catholic Diocese.

Affiant contends Judge Fuerst should be disqualified because it is impossible for a Catholic judge to fairly and impartially preside over this lawsuit. He also alleges that participation in this case by a Catholic judge creates an appearance of impropriety and would undermine the public's confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.

Affiant essentially suggests adoption of a per se rule that would require disqualification of a judge from any case in which a religious organization with which the judge is affiliated is a member. Such a rule would be contrary to the presumption that a judge fairly and impartially considers all matters coming before the judge. This action has been pending before Judge Fuerst for more than two years, and affiant does not cite any specific actions by Judge Fuerst as evidence of bias or prejudice against him or in favor of the defendants. Absent a specific demonstration of bias or prejudice or the existence of some other disqualifying interest, I decline to adopt a general rule that mandates the disqualification of a judge from a case involving a religious organization with which the judge is affiliated.

The affidavit of disqualification is found not well taken and is denied. The case shall proceed before Judge Fuerst.


Summaries of

In re Disqualification of Fuerst

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 17, 1996
77 Ohio St. 3d 1253 (Ohio 1996)

In Fuerst, I declined to establish a per se rule of disqualification based on a judge's religious affiliation, absent some affirmative indication of bias, prejudice, or other disqualifying interest.

Summary of this case from Koukios v. Ganson
Case details for

In re Disqualification of Fuerst

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF FUERST. DOE v. RUPP ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 17, 1996

Citations

77 Ohio St. 3d 1253 (Ohio 1996)
674 N.E.2d 361

Citing Cases

State v. Kanode (In re O'Grady)

Without more, Judge O'Grady's attenuated connections to the CDP and/or the FOP are insufficient to overcome…

State v. Kanode (In re O'Grady)

attenuated connections to the CDP and/or the FOP are insufficient to overcome the presumption that he will be…