From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disciplinary Action Against Pang

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 21, 1994
522 N.W.2d 921 (Minn. 1994)

Summary

concluding that disbarment is warranted for lawyer who, over a period of years, engaged in repeated and continued neglect of client matters, misappropriated client funds, and failed to cooperate with the Director's investigation

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action Against Grzybek

Opinion

No. C3-93-1000.

September 21, 1994.


ORDER

WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action, together with first and second supplemental petitions, alleging with specificity that respondent Gary Y. Pang has, over a period of years, engaged in repeated and continued neglect of client matters, has misappropriated client funds and has failed to cooperate with the Director's investigation; and

WHEREAS, the respondent has unconditionally admitted the allegations of the multiple petitions, has waived any rights he has pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director by which they jointly recommend respondent's disbarment and the payment of $750 in costs and disbursements;

WHEREAS, this court has independently reviewed the record and agrees that the conduct admitted to by respondent warrants disbarment,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is accepted and approved and Gary Y. Pang is disbarred from the practice of law. The Director is awarded costs and disbursements in the amount of $750.

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne -----------------


Summaries of

In re Disciplinary Action Against Pang

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 21, 1994
522 N.W.2d 921 (Minn. 1994)

concluding that disbarment is warranted for lawyer who, over a period of years, engaged in repeated and continued neglect of client matters, misappropriated client funds, and failed to cooperate with the Director's investigation

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action Against Grzybek

concluding that disbarment is warranted for attorney who, over a period of years, engaged in repeated and continued neglect of client matters, misappropriated client funds, and failed to cooperate with the Director's investigation

Summary of this case from Petition for Discipl. Act. Against Weems

disbarring an attorney who, over a period of years, misappropriated client funds, engaged in repeated and continued neglect of client matters, and failed to cooperate with the disciplinary investigation

Summary of this case from In re Matson

disbarring an attorney for engaging in repeated and continued neglect of client matters, misappropriating client funds, and failing to cooperate with the Director's investigation

Summary of this case from Disciplinary Action v. Wolff

disbarring attorney for misappropriation, repeated and continued neglect of client matters, and noncooperation

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action Against Dovolis

ordering disbarment for repeated and continued neglect of client matters, misappropriation and noncooperation

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action Against Harp
Case details for

In re Disciplinary Action Against Pang

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Gary Y. PANG, an Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 21, 1994

Citations

522 N.W.2d 921 (Minn. 1994)

Citing Cases

Petition for Discipl. Act. Against Weems

See, e.g., In re Pang, 522 N.W.2d 921 (Minn. 1994) (concluding that disbarment is warranted for attorney who,…

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Fahrenholtz

See, e.g. , In re Grzybek , 567 N.W.2d 259, 263, 265 (Minn. 1997) (disbarring an attorney for repeatedly…