From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Deseno

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 9, 2011
205 N.J. 91 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

March 9, 2011.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-247, concluding that THOMAS DeSENO of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS DeSENO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Deseno

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 9, 2011
205 N.J. 91 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In re Deseno

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS DESENO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 033241990)

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 9, 2011

Citations

205 N.J. 91 (N.J. 2011)
13 A.3d 357

Citing Cases

In re Ianetti

The minimum measure of discipline for a misrepresentation to a client or a disciplinary authority is a…

In re Gruber

The minimum measure of discipline for a misrepresentation to a client, a third party, or a disciplinary…