From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Deitch

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 9, 2012
209 N.J. 423 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-9

In the Matter of Marc Adam DEITCH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 039591991).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–293, concluding that MARC ADAM DEITCH of ISELIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client trust funds), RPC 5.3(a) and (b) (failure to supervise nonlawyer employee) and RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21–6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARC ADAM DEITCH is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Deitch

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 9, 2012
209 N.J. 423 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Deitch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Marc Adam DEITCH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

209 N.J. 423 (N.J. 2012)
209 N.J. 423

Citing Cases

In re Shtindler

funds and diverted audit and temporary suspension notices from his attention; he also engaged in…

In re Wasserstrum

See, e.g., In re Bardis, 210 N.J. 253 (2012) (admonition for attorney who failed to reconcile and review his…