From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dayjore Isaiah M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 26, 2013
109 A.D.3d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-26

In re DAYJORE ISAIAH M., etc., and Another, Dependent Children Under The Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Dominique Shaniqua M., etc., Respondent–Appellant, Lutheran Social Services of New York, Petitioner–Respondent.

Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant. Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent.



Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant. Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent.
Ballon Stoll Bader & Nadler, P.C., New York (Frederic P. Schneider of counsel), attorney for the children.

GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, ACOSTA, RENWICK, JJ.

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about September 28, 2012, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent-appellant mother had violated the terms of a suspended judgment, terminated her parental rights to the subject children, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination that respondent had violated the terms of a suspended judgment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Matter of Isiah Steven A. [Anne Elizabeth Pierre L.], 100 A.D.3d 559, 560, 955 N.Y.S.2d 10 [1st Dept. 2012], lv. denied20 N.Y.3d 859, 2013 WL 535792 [2013] ). The record shows that respondent failed to consistently visit with the children, participate in individual therapy, obtain suitable housing for herself and the children, and obtain a source of income ( see id.; see also Matter of Lourdes O., 52 A.D.3d 203, 203, 859 N.Y.S.2d 78 [1st Dept. 2008] ).

A preponderance of the evidence also supports the determination that termination of respondent's parental rights is in the children's best interests ( Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147–148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). At the time of the dispositional hearing, respondent had not obtained suitable housing or a source of income. Further, the children have been in the same foster home for at least three years, and their foster mother, who has provided for their special needs, wishes to adopt them ( see Matter of Isiah Steven A., 100 A.D.3d at 560, 955 N.Y.S.2d 10).


Summaries of

In re Dayjore Isaiah M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 26, 2013
109 A.D.3d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

In re Dayjore Isaiah M.

Case Details

Full title:In re DAYJORE ISAIAH M., etc., and Another, Dependent Children Under The…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
109 A.D.3d 745
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6067

Citing Cases

Seamen's Soc'y for Children & Families v. Stephan J.W. (In re Stefano E.W.)

Contrary to the father's contention, the fact that the child was discharged from foster care from February…

Maria T. v. Sheltering Arms Children & Family Servs. (In re Frederick T.)

She also failed to take steps to secure suitable housing and a source of income. In contrast, the children…