From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1281 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503373.

April 11, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 2, 2007, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Alton Davis, New York City, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Carpinello, Lahtinen, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ.


A claimant who performs activities on behalf of a business, even if such activities are minimal and do not generate income, will not be considered totally unemployed, "`provided that the claimant stands to benefit financially from the continued existence of the business'" ( Matter of Siegel [Commissioner of Labor], 43 AD3d 1224, 1224-1225, quoting Matter of Swan [Commissioner of Labor], 40 AD3d 1295, 1295). Here, claimant testified that, at the time he was certifying for benefits, he was the owner of a corporation he formed for the purpose of recording and marketing music and, in connection therewith, he actively worked toward improving and "mastering" his songs with the goal of selling them. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed ( see Matter of Ibrahim [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1128; Matter of Landry [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1020, 1021).

Furthermore, the fact that claimant received an informational handbook informing him of the obligation to report any business activity that could generate income but failed to do so is sufficient to support the determination that claimant made false statements of fact permitting the recovery of benefits ( see Labor Law § 597; Matter of Bothe [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 759, 759-760; Matter of Raspallo [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 751, 751-752). That claimant admittedly did not read the handbook does not provide him with a defense ( see Matter of Bothe [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d at 760).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1281 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Davis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ALTON DAVIS, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1281 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3274
855 N.Y.S.2d 305