From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Darr

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Feb 11, 1916
232 F. 415 (N.D. Cal. 1916)

Opinion


232 F. 415 (N.D.Cal. 1916) In re DARR. No. 9932. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 11, 1916

Rodolph Hatfield, of Oakland, Cal., for bankrupt.

DOOLING, District Judge.

The petitioner has presented an oath in forma pauperis, and asks that he be permitted to file his petition and schedules without paying the clerk the fees provided for by law. His schedules show that he has paid his attorney the sum of $35. If this sum was paid from his estate, he should not be allowed to file his petition without paying the required fees, because in the order of priority established by the statute the clerk's fee takes precedence over the fees of his attorney, and a bankrupt cannot reverse this order by paying his attorney first and not paying the clerk at all.

The motion that the clerk be directed to file his petition without fees is therefore denied.


Summaries of

In re Darr

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Feb 11, 1916
232 F. 415 (N.D. Cal. 1916)
Case details for

In re Darr

Case Details

Full title:In re DARR.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 1916

Citations

232 F. 415 (N.D. Cal. 1916)

Citing Cases

In re Stephenson

The Takeshorse Court finds support for its decision in the Advisory Committee note to Rule 1006(b): The…