From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Culverhouse

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 18, 2007
214 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-15081 Non-Argument Calendar.

January 18, 2007.

Mark D. Griffin, Alabama Department of Revenue, Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

James M. Sizemore, Jr., Alex City, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. D.C. Docket Nos. 05-00345-CV-F-S 03-12288-WRS.

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.


The sole issue in this bankruptcy appeal is whether Alabama's motor vehicle excise tax applies to vehicles that an Alabama company exerts control over but which are located and first used in another state. It is an issue of Alabama law. In Fleming Foods of Alabama, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 648 So.2d 577 (Ala. 1994), the Alabama Supreme Court stated that: "a use tax is not a tax on revenues generated from carrying on interstate business . . . but is an excise tax imposed upon the privilege of storing, using, or otherwise consuming tangible personal property purchased at retail outside the state and domiciled in the state." Id. at 579 (emphasis added). Given the plain meaning of those words, we agree with the district court that the tax is not applicable to the vehicles at issue in this case. The arguments of the Department of Revenue to the contrary are adequately answered in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned memorandum opinion and order. Culver-house, Inc. v. Ala. Dep't of Revenue (In re Culverhouse, Inc.), 358 B.R. 806 (M.D.Ala. 2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

In re Culverhouse

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 18, 2007
214 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

In re Culverhouse

Case Details

Full title:In re: CULVERHOUSE, INC., d.b.a. Alabama Trucking, Debtor. Culverhouse…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2007

Citations

214 F. App'x 921 (11th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Boyd Bros v. State

In addition, non-resident consumers are encouraged to enter the state to make a purchase because they can…