From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1996
233 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 21, 1996.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Berore: Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ.


Petitioner was an inmate at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County when he was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault, violent conduct, disturbance, refusing a direct order and possession of a weapon. The charges arose out of petitioner's participation in a five-man fight, during the course of which he stabbed a fellow inmate twice with an ice-pick type weapon. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt on the grounds that it was not based upon substantial evidence and that it was the result of bias on the part of the Hearing Officer. We disagree.

Adduced in evidence against petitioner was the eyewitness testimony of three correction officers, the misbehavior report written by one of these officers and a videotape of the fight taken from the guard tower. We find this evidence sufficient to support the determination of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). To the extent that petitioner's testimony and that of his inmate witnesses was in conflict with the testimony of the correction officers and with the narration of the misbehavior report, such conflict presented an issue of credibility, which was appropriately determined by the Hearing Officer ( see, supra, at 966). Nor are we persuaded by petitioner's charge of bias on the part of the Hearing Officer. The record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1996
233 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAURICE RUFFIN, Petitioner, v. PHILIP J. COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 1012

Citing Cases

Matter of Medina v. Stinson

Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from fighting and…

Matter of Heath v. Selsky

Furthermore, the misbehavior reports and corroborating testimony of various eyewitnesses constituted…