From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Conroy

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 2005
185 N.J. 277 (N.J. 2005)

Opinion

November 4, 2005


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-173, concluding that JOHN S. CONROY, IV, of BURLINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds), RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with Rule 1:21-6) and Rule 1:21-6 (attorney recordkeeping requirements);

And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that respondent should be required to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics quarterly reconciliations of his attorney books and records for a period of two years;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN S. CONROY, IV, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics quarterly reconciliations of the books and records maintained pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 for a period of two years, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Conroy

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 2005
185 N.J. 277 (N.J. 2005)
Case details for

In re Conroy

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN S. CONROY, IV, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 4, 2005

Citations

185 N.J. 277 (N.J. 2005)
884 A.2d 1254

Citing Cases

In re Wianecki

, In the Matter of Clifford G. Stewart, DRB 16-061 (May 24, 2016) (multiple recordkeeping violations), and In…

In re Spielberg

Even in the absence of a negligent misappropriation, however, a reprimand may be imposed if the attorney has…