From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Connor v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 2005
22 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6908.

October 27, 2005.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated June 24, 2003, terminating petitioner's employment as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William A. Wetzel, J.], entered January 13, 2004) dismissed, without costs.

Anthony J. Connor, petitioner pro se.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Grace Goodman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.


Respondent's rejection of petitioner's claim that his ingestion of cocaine was unknowing is based in part upon the Hearing Officer's conclusion that the amount of cocaine metabolite in the urine sample is inconsistent with his claim of unknowing ingestion and upon findings of credibility. There is substantial support in the record for the former and the latter is largely beyond our review ( see Matter of Adams v. Police Dept. of City of N.Y., 256, AD2d 28 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 818; Matter of Taylor v. Raiford, 159 AD2d 309). The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness ( see Matter of Gordon v. Brown, 84 NY2d 574, 580; Matter of Jackson v. Safir, 261 AD2d 348). Petitioner waived his argument that the Hearing Officer should have admitted a certain tape into evidence. In any event, since respondent did not argue that petitioner's testimony at the administrative hearing was a recent fabrication, the Hearing Officer correctly declined to admit the prior consistent statements ( see People v. McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 18). We find no support in the record for petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer was biased against him.


Summaries of

In re Connor v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 2005
22 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In re Connor v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY J. CONNOR, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7999
802 N.Y.S.2d 683

Citing Cases

In Matter of Rice v. Belfiore

In this regard, the Court recognizes the fragility of petitioner's claims given the numerous decisions…

Jones v. Kelly

There is no basis for disturbing the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations ( see Matter of Berenhaus…