From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cofer

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 10, 2012
NO. 14-11-01111-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 14-11-01111-CR

01-10-2012

IN RE MARCUS COFER, Relator


Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2012.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 28, 2011, relator Marcus Cofer filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Vanessa Velasquez, presiding judge of the 183rd District Court of Harris County to rule on his Motion to Quash Charge, Motion to Quash Indictment, and Motion for Discovery.

To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S. W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and before the court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) (orig. proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to do so. In re Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding); In re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding) (relator must show that trial court received, was aware of, and was asked to rule on motion).

Relator has not provided this court with copies of the motions on which he requests rulings. In addition, relator has not established that the motions were properly filed and that the trial court was asked to rule on them but failed to do so. It is relator's burden to provide this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a).

Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison. Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Cofer

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 10, 2012
NO. 14-11-01111-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

In re Cofer

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MARCUS COFER, Relator

Court:Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

NO. 14-11-01111-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 10, 2012)