From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Christopher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2010
78 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 3711, 3712.

November 30, 2010.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about January 15, 2009, which, upon a fact-finding determination of neglect against respondent mother, inter alia, released the subject children to their nonrespondent father, and order, same court and Judge, entered on or about January 15, 2009, which awarded custody of the children to petitioner father, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

January W., appellant pro se.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Norman Corenthal of counsel), for Administration for Children's Services, respondent.

Before: Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.


A preponderance of the evidence supports the court's finding that the children's physical, mental or emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of respondent mother's long-standing history of mental illness and resistance to treatment ( see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [b] [i]). Respondent testified to multiple extended hospitalizations for mental illness and stated that she would not resume medication or treatment even if it meant that the children would not be returned to her. The record also demonstrates that respondent kept one child home from school for most of the month of September, before she was approved for homeschooling ( see Matter of Danny R., 60 AD3d 450).

The evidence at the consolidated hearing on the disposition of the neglect petition and the father's custody petition, which showed that respondent has failed to address her mental illness and its effects on the children and that the children are attending school and otherwise doing well while living with their father, supports the court's determination that the best interests of the children were served by releasing them to their father and awarding the father custody of them ( see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171).

We have reviewed respondent's remaining arguments and find them without merit.


Summaries of

In re Christopher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2010
78 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Christopher

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER R. and Others, Children Alleged to be…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8777
912 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Rosalie V. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Jesiel C. V.)

Although there was some evidence presented during the fact-finding hearing that the mother's neighbor had…

Derick L. v. Catherine W.

The record shows that the child was absent 63 of 73 days during the early portion of the 2012 school year…