From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Castiglia

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 5, 1999
727 A.2d 1021 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

May 5, 1999.


ORDER

This matter having been presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-10 (b) following a motion for discipline by consent of V. JAMES CASTIGLIA of OAK RIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.5 (failure to execute a fee agreement), RPC 1.7 conflict of interest), and RPC 8.4 (c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit of misrepresentation);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 1.5, RPC 1.7 and RPC 8.4 (c) and that said conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule 1:20-10 (b)(3) to determine the appropriate measure of discipline for respondent's misconduct;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20-16 (16)(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that V. JAMES CASTIGLIA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Castiglia

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 5, 1999
727 A.2d 1021 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

In re Castiglia

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF V. JAMES CASTIGLIA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 5, 1999

Citations

727 A.2d 1021 (N.J. 1999)
727 A.2d 1021

Citing Cases

In re Pocaro

ssenger in automobile matters; after filing the complaints, the attorney allowed them to be dismissed and…

In re Roper

Reprimands have been imposed on attorneys who, in addition to engaging in conflict-of-interest situations,…