From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cameron

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 7, 2007
192 N.J. 396 (N.J. 2007)

Opinion

September 7, 2007.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-058, concluding that JOSE M. CAMERON of PERTH AMBOY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information), and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect a client's interest upon termination of the representation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that an admonition is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSE M. CAMERON is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Cameron

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 7, 2007
192 N.J. 396 (N.J. 2007)
Case details for

In re Cameron

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSE M. CAMERON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 7, 2007

Citations

192 N.J. 396 (N.J. 2007)
929 A.2d 1090

Citing Cases

In re Ruiz-Uribe

See e.g., In the Matter of William E. Wackowski, DRB 09-212 (November 25, 2009) (attorney permitted a…

In re Peruto

Attorneys with no disciplinary history who violate RPC 1.3, RPC 1.4(b), and RPC 1.16(d), even when…