From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brunet

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 30, 2013
106 A.D.3d 1443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-30

In the Matter of Stacie J. BRUNET, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Stacie J. Brunet, Respondent.

Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner. Corrigan, McCoy & Bush, PLLC, Rensselaer (Scott W. Bush of counsel), for respondent.


Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner. Corrigan, McCoy & Bush, PLLC, Rensselaer (Scott W. Bush of counsel), for respondent.
Before: STEIN, J.P., SPAIN, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2002. She maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County.

On February 13, 2013, respondent was convicted upon her plea of guilty in Fulton County Court of the crime of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony. Petitioner moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a) and (b) to strike respondent's name from the roll of attorneys. Respondent opposes the motion and requests that the Court consider her mitigating circumstances.

By operation of law ( seeJudiciary Law § 90[4][a] ), respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney when she entered her guilty plea to a felony and we, therefore, grant petitioner's motion to strike respondent's name from the role of attorneys, a formality which merely confirms respondent's disbarred status ( see Matter of Hutson, 72 A.D.3d 1328, 898 N.Y.S.2d 531 [2010];Matter of Krouner, 305 A.D.2d 932, 759 N.Y.S.2d 402 [2003];see also Matter of Shmaruk, 29 A.D.3d 138, 812 N.Y.S.2d 623 [2006] ).

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of *735another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( see22 NYCRR 806.9).

STEIN, J.P., SPAIN, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Brunet

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 30, 2013
106 A.D.3d 1443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

In re Brunet

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Stacie J. BRUNET, an Attorney. Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 30, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 1443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3911
965 N.Y.S.2d 734

Citing Cases

In re Sanderson

Petitioner moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a) and (b) to strike respondent's name from the roll of…

In re Tendler

Tendler was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney by operation of law in October 2014 when she…