From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brian Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 30, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510736.

June 30, 2011.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review separate determinations of respondent which found petitioners guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Joel Landau, Prisoner Legal Services, Albany, for petitioners.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ.


Petitioners, two prison inmates, were charged in separate misbehavior reports with gang activity, conspiring to commit assault on staff and conspiring to engage in group violence. Following separate tier III hearings, petitioners were found guilty as charged. These determinations were affirmed on administrative review and petitioners thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

In their petition petitioners limit their challenge to that part of the determinations that found them guilty of conspiring to commit assault on staff and conspiring to lead group violence and do not contest the portion of the determinations finding them guilty of gang activity. Respondent concedes that the determinations of guilt on these conspiracy charges are not supported by substantial evidence and, based upon our review of the record, we agree. Accordingly, the petition is granted and, in light of the undischarged administrative penalty and the recommended loss of good time, we remit this matter to respondent for a redetermination of the penalties imposed ( see Matter of Gomez v Leclaire, 53 AD3d 994, 995).

Adjudged that the determinations are modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioners guilty of conspiring to commit assault on staff and conspiring to lead group violence and imposed penalties; petition granted, respondent is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioners' institutional records and matter remitted to respondent for an administrative redetermination of the penalties on the remaining violations; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

In re Brian Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 30, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Brian Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TYRELLE JOSEPH et al., Petitioners, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5603
925 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Tarbell v. Prack

Initially, the Attorney General concedes, and we agree, that the record does not contain substantial evidence…

Parker v. Comm'r of Docs

The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.…