From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bogard

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 20, 2014
102 A.3d 380 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-11-20

In the Matter of Mark D. BOGARD, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 041362008).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14–024, concluding that MARK D. BOGARD of REGO PARK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2008, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK D. BOGARD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Bogard

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 20, 2014
102 A.3d 380 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Bogard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mark D. BOGARD, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

102 A.3d 380 (N.J. 2014)
220 N.J. 44

Citing Cases

In re Franklin

at it had not been reinstated; we considered that the attorney had no other final discipline in over…

In re DeBrango-Berenguer

See, e.g., In re Bogard, 220 N.J. 44 (2014) (reprimand for gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure to…