From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Blumberg Associates v. Abramovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 2002
298 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-11095

Argued October 8, 2002.

October 28, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated November 8, 2001, which denied the petition.

Ezra and Howe, Elmont, N.Y. (Joel Ezra of counsel), for appellants.

Kolber Linn, LLC, Kew Gardens Hills, N.Y. (David A. Linn of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

In a decision and order in a related proceeding, this court previously determined that the agreement between the petitioners and the late Melvin Ungar was an illegal fee-splitting agreement (see Matter of Ungar v. Matarazzo Blumberg Assocs., 260 A.D.2d 485). Contrary to the respondents' contention, the agreement violates Judiciary Law § 491 in that it clearly contemplates the payment of a share of legal fees to a nonlawyer as compensation for the procurement of clients. Since the agreement is illegal and unenforceable, the Supreme Court should have granted a stay of arbitration of the claims arising out of its alleged breach (see Durst v. Abrash, 22 A.D.2d 39, affd 17 N.Y.2d 445; 52 Flavors v. Baker Confectionery Salesclerks Union, Local 150 of Greater N.Y., Retail Clerks Intl. Assn., AFL-CIO, 46 A.D.2d 875; Matter of Toffler v. Pokorny, 157 Misc.2d 703). Under the circumstances, the petitioners did not waive their right to seek a stay of arbitration (see Matter of Toffler v. Pokorny, supra; see also Matter of Land of the Free v. Unique Sanitation, 93 N.Y.2d 942).

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Blumberg Associates v. Abramovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 2002
298 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Blumberg Associates v. Abramovitz

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MATARAZZO BLUMBERG ASSOCIATES, P.C., ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 62

Citing Cases

Hamilton Capital VII, LLC v. Khorrami, LLP

for any person, partnership, corporation, or association to divide with or receive from, or to agree to…

Hamilton Capital VI, LLC v. Khorrami, LLP

for any person, partnership, corporation, or association to divide with or receive from, or to agree to…