From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Block

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 7, 2013
61 A.3d 145 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-7

In the Matter of Adam Kenneth BLOCK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 046571993).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–254, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f)(default by respondent), that ADAM KENNETH BLOCK, formerly of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a)(practicing law while ineligible), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ADAM KENNETH BLOCK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Block

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 7, 2013
61 A.3d 145 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Block

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Adam Kenneth BLOCK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

61 A.3d 145 (N.J. 2013)
213 N.J. 80

Citing Cases

In re Block

On March 7, 2013, respondent received a reprimand for practicing while ineligible, based on his failure to…

In re Block

On March 7, 2013, respondent received a reprimand for practicing while ineligible for failure to pay the…