From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bledsoe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.
Oct 4, 2017
532 S.W.3d 826 (Tex. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 06-17-00097-CV

10-04-2017

IN RE: Jamie Lee BLEDSOE

Jamie Lee Bledsoe, pro se.


Jamie Lee Bledsoe, pro se.

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

OPINION

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

Jamie Lee Bledsoe, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to direct Warden Calhoun, the Warden at the Joe F. Gurney Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), to return certain property he alleges was taken from him by TDCJ personnel. We deny his petition.

This Court has limited mandamus jurisdiction, which is limited to issuing a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district." Act of May 26, 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., ch. 740, § 1, 2017 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 3166, 3166 (codified at TEX. GOV'T CODE § 22.221(b)(1) ). Our jurisdiction does not extend to other parties unless such mandamus relief would be necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a) (West 2004).

Since Bledsoe's requested relief is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we must deny his petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Bledsoe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.
Oct 4, 2017
532 S.W.3d 826 (Tex. App. 2017)
Case details for

In re Bledsoe

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: Jamie Lee BLEDSOE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

532 S.W.3d 826 (Tex. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

In re Torres

Relator does not seek relief against a judge in our district and he does not contend that mandamus relief is…

In re Lopez

Further, Lopez does not contend that mandamus relief is necessary to enforce this Court's jurisdiction. See…