From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bittinger

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Aug 23, 2010
No. 14-10-00697-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 14-10-00697-CV

Opinion filed August 23, 2010.

Original Proceeding Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices BROWN, SULLIVAN, and CHRISTOPHER.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On July 27, 2010, relator, Robert Bittinger, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to review the supersedeas bond set by the trial court.

Rule 24.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

"A party may seek review of the trial court's ruling by motion filed in the court of appeals with jurisdiction or potential jurisdiction over the appeal from the judgment in the case. A party may seek review of the court of appeals' ruling on the motion by petition of review in the Supreme Court."

Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(a).

Relator's appeal has been assigned to this court and is pending in No. 14-10-00698-CV. Relator's remedy is to file a motion in the pending appeal pursuant Rule 24.4(a).

Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Bittinger

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Aug 23, 2010
No. 14-10-00697-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2010)
Case details for

In re Bittinger

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ROBERT BITTINGER, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Aug 23, 2010

Citations

No. 14-10-00697-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Kuhr v. Smith

(mem. op.) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction direct appeal from order setting supersedeas bond);…

In re Polley

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also In re…