From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Bernson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Nov 19, 1917
35 Cal.App. 344 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)

Opinion

Crim. No. 580.

November 19, 1917.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H. E. Johnstone, and Emmons Johnstone, for Petitioner.

J. R. Dorsey, District Attorney, and W. P. Grijalva, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.


It appears to the court that the imprisonment of the petitioner from which he seeks to be discharged was voluntarily submitted to by him for the purpose of presenting in this proceeding the question as to the validity of the order holding him to answer to the superior court for trial, and for that reason the remedy by habeas corpus should not be available to him.

Upon the authority of In re Gow, 139 Cal. 242, [73 P. 1451, Ex parte Schmitz, 150 Cal. 663, [ 89 P. 438], and Ex parte Ford, 160 Cal. 334, [Ann. Cas. 1912D, 1267, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 882, 116 P. 757], it is ordered that the proceeding be and it is hereby dismissed, and petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff.


Summaries of

In re Application of Bernson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Nov 19, 1917
35 Cal.App. 344 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
Case details for

In re Application of Bernson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of B. BERNSON for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Nov 19, 1917

Citations

35 Cal.App. 344 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
169 P. 916

Citing Cases

In re Ortiz

(See In re Gow, 139 Cal. 242 [ 73 P. 145]; Ex parte Schmitz, 150 Cal. 663 [ 89 P. 438]; In re Miller, 13…

In re Application of Bocci

en allowed to go at large on his own recognizance he will not be permitted to test the legality of his…