From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bernard

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Mar 27, 2003
99 S.W.3d 929 (Tex. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. 14-02-01181-CV.

Opinion filed March 27, 2003.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, WRIT OF MANDAMUS.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Steven Bernard, Livingston, for relators.

Panel consists of Justices EDELMAN, SEYMORE, GUZMAN.


OPINION


On November 19, 2002, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't. Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2002); see also Tex.R.App.P. 52. Appellant sought a writ of mandamus to require the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on his petition for writ of mandamus filed in the trial court. On December 16, 2002, the trial court held a hearing and denied relator's petition. Because the trial court has held a hearing and ruled on relator's petition in the trial court, relator's petition for writ of mandamus against the trial judge is moot.

Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Bernard

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Mar 27, 2003
99 S.W.3d 929 (Tex. App. 2003)
Case details for

In re Bernard

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STEVEN BERNARD, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Mar 27, 2003

Citations

99 S.W.3d 929 (Tex. App. 2003)