From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Beran

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 20, 2017
230 N.J. 61 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

07-20-2017

In the MATTER OF Barry J. BERAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 019301980)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16–233, concluding that BARRY J. BERAN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4 (b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY J. BERAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Beran

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 20, 2017
230 N.J. 61 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

In re Beran

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Barry J. BERAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 20, 2017

Citations

230 N.J. 61 (N.J. 2017)
165 A.3d 722

Citing Cases

In re Beran

Although only one client was involved, we considered, in aggravation, respondent's ethics history and his…

In re Beran

Although only one client was involved, we considered, in aggravation, respondent's ethics history and his…