From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Beasley

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 11, 2017
No. 05-17-01365-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2017)

Opinion

No. 05-17-01365-CV

12-11-2017

IN RE PETER BEASLEY, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-03141

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright
Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Before the Court is relator's petition for writ of mandamus in which he complains of a November 3, 2017 sanctions order and a November 22, 2017 order denying his motion to disqualify and recuse the trial judge. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE 171365F.P05


Summaries of

In re Beasley

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 11, 2017
No. 05-17-01365-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2017)
Case details for

In re Beasley

Case Details

Full title:IN RE PETER BEASLEY, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Dec 11, 2017

Citations

No. 05-17-01365-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2017)

Citing Cases

Beasley v. Soc'y of Info. Mgmt.

5. In re Peter Beasley, No. 05-17-01365-CV, 2017 WL 6276006 (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 11, 2017) (orig.…