From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bahnson

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia
Feb 23, 2009
Case No. 08-00693 (Bankr. D.D.C. Feb. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 08-00693.

February 23, 2009


Not for Publication in West's Bankruptcy Reporter MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER STRIKING REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT


The debtor has filed a reaffirmation agreement with Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Docket Entry No. 24, filed February 12, 2009). The agreement is ineffective.

The reaffirmation agreement filed by the debtor failed to explain any discrepancy between the debtor's expenses listed on Schedule J and his current monthly expenses, as required by Rule 4008(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. See In re Jo, 2007 WL 4411619, at *1 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2007). The reaffirmation agreement is also untimely under Rule 4008(a). It is thus

ORDERED that the reaffirmation agreement is stricken.

The document below is signed with the reference to "Rule 4008(a)" changed to "Rule 4008(a)".


Summaries of

In re Bahnson

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia
Feb 23, 2009
Case No. 08-00693 (Bankr. D.D.C. Feb. 23, 2009)
Case details for

In re Bahnson

Case Details

Full title:In re PHILIP BAHNSON, (Chapter 7), Debtor

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Feb 23, 2009

Citations

Case No. 08-00693 (Bankr. D.D.C. Feb. 23, 2009)