From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE BACH

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 7, 2009
No. 09-8516 (D.C. Cir. May. 7, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-8516.

Filed On: May 7, 2009.

BEFORE: Sentelle, Chief Judge, and Griffith and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges.


ORDER OF DISBARMENT

Upon consideration of the court's order filed March 5, 2009, directing respondent to show cause why he should not be disbarred based on his disbarment by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals on February 26, 2009, and the lack of any response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that William S. Bach be disbarred and, accordingly, be prohibited from further practice of law before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See D.C. Cir. Rules, App. II, Rule IV. Respondent has not responded to the order to show cause and, therefore, has not carried his burden to demonstrate any lack of notice or infirmity of proof in the underlying proceeding in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, that disbarment is gravely unjust, or that his misconduct warrants substantially different discipline. See id., Rule IV(c). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that William S. Bach be prohibited from holding himself out to be an attorney at law licensed to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.


Summaries of

IN RE BACH

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 7, 2009
No. 09-8516 (D.C. Cir. May. 7, 2009)
Case details for

IN RE BACH

Case Details

Full title:In re: William Spencer Bach, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: May 7, 2009

Citations

No. 09-8516 (D.C. Cir. May. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Gordon v. Dadante

Only after weighing all the evidence may the district court decide whether a sanction is warranted."); cf. In…